Cast: Mohawk Mata as herself / Hero-none-the-wiser as himself / Joy Dehradun as himself and introducing Henry the Rottweiler as his dog self.

This is a short one-act, off-key musical play about a feisty parliamentarian, her ex-boyfriend Joy Dehradun, a Rottweiler named Henry and Hero-none-the-wiser, a wealthy, off-shore industrialist (at least, he seems to spend much of his time off India’s shores) who has access to the feisty, at times hysterical, parliamentarian’s official login id, through which he can periodically feed awkward questions for the over-the-top parliamentarian to parrot faithfully, and histrionically, during (un)parliamentary debates. The general idea being to bring disrepute to some other fat cat industrialist, and through him, to the supreme head of our government, hoping to make him squirm and with any luck, fall. Not just fall from grace, but fall period. Like the Roman empire. Let us see how they get on.

(As the curtain rises, the stage reveals a fierce-looking, black Rottweiler sitting on a plush sofa and gnawing contentedly on a bone. Enter stage left, a youngish lady, sporting Randolph Amelia shades and dressed in a colourful sari, with a Louis Vuitton bag ostentatiously slung over her shoulder. She is our feisty parliamentarian, Mohawk Mata, waving her LVMH bag to go with her Gucci scarf. Her western fashion accoutrements are contrastingly set off by a prominent large, red bindi on her forehead. Her joy knows no bounds upon seeing Henry as she breaks into song, while hugging and slobbering all over the canine. Henry joins in too, as you will see).

Mohawk Mata – ‘There’s a hole in the cushion, dear Henry, dear Henry / There’s hole in the cushion, dear Henry a hole.’

Henry – ‘Then mend it, dear Mohawk, dear Mohawk, then mend it, dear Mohawk, then mend it. I am trained to gouge out holes in cushions. How is that for a doggerel, Mohawk?’

Mohawk Mata – ‘Very cute. But it was you that bit into the cushion, dear Henry, dear Henry. Why should I mend it, dear Henry, you naughty, naughty boy?’

(Readers will have observed that they have gone clean off script from the original song and have started improvising. The rest of the song goes to pot, while Henry goes potty on the sofa).

Henry – ‘Because, dear Mohawk, you did not teach me how to mend cushions. You taught me how to bite and chew, which is what I do for a living. Mending is your affair. All that once bitten, twice shy nonsense does not apply to me. Anyhow, sitting at home, I see that you are quite adept yourself at biting, chewing and spitting out bits of your opponents’ flesh in parliament. The cameras are never off your scarily mobile face. But mind, you tend to froth at the mouth. People might think you’ve contracted rabies. Not from me, thank God, but clearly, I have taught you something.’

Mohawk Mata – ‘Yes, my dear sweetie-kin, you have taught me so many things. My bark is now fiercer than my bite. Oops, there goes my mobile. Excuse me, Henry, I have to take this. Oh God, that is Hero-none-the-wiser on the line. I shan’t be a tick, Henry. Ok, ok, I will attend to your ticks in a moment. Hullo, hullo, is this who I think this is?’

As Hero-none-the-wiser is calling from Dubai, his voice is heard over the theatre sound system.

Hero-none-the-wiser – ‘Like you didn’t know. Listen Mohawk, I am in deep excrement, thanks to you. Why couldn’t you keep your trap shut? How much more do you want for questions? This ‘cash for query’ nonsense is hitting the roof, and I am tired of having to answer awkward questions from the media with that same old ‘I have said whatever I want in my affidavit.’ For crying out loud, tom-tomming to the whole world about your Italian handbags and your Ferragamo shoes, not to mention your French perfumes. Look where it has landed you? And me. All over social media as well.’ At this point, Hero-none-the-wiser, on cue, breaks into a recent Van Morrison hit song.

‘Why are you on Facebook? / Why do you need second-hand friends? Why do you care who’s trending? / Or is there something you’re defending? / Get a life, is it that empty and sad? / Or are you after something you can’t have? / Did you miss your fifteen minutes of fame? / Or do you not have any shame? / Put yourself in the frame / For what some people work very hard to attain / Or are you looking for a scapegoat to blame / ‘Cause you’re a failure again / Why are you on Facebook? / Why are you on Facebook?’

As the chorus line fades, Hero-none-the-wiser waits for Mohawk Mata’s response.

Mohawk Mata – ‘Catchy song Hero, but you have been had. Spilling the beans under pressure from ‘we-know-who’ in your affidavit, what were you thinking? So I gave you my login and password. Big deal. Everybody’s got everybody else’s login and password in parliament. Nothing to make a big song and dance about. By the way, I am more an X (ex-Twitter) person than a Facebook fiend.’

Hero-none-the-wiser – ‘You mean you were a twit and you are now an X-twit.’

Mohawk now throws her head back and begins to warble, a la John Lennon with a streptococcal infection.

‘Here I stand, head in hand / Turn my face to the wall / If he’s gone I can’t go on / Feeling two foot small / Everywhere people stare / Each and every day / I can see them laugh at me / And I hear them say / Hey, you’ve got to hide your love away / Hey, you’ve got to hide your love away.’

As the song comes to a close, Mohawk Mata’s erstwhile boyfriend enters stage left, Joy Dehradun. On seeing him, Henry the Rottweiler leaps from the sofa straight on to Joy Dehradun’s chest, knocking the handsome lawyer base over apex, simpering, whining and licking the poor man all over his face.

Joy Dehradun – ‘There, there, who’s a good boy then Henry? You love me? Of course, you do. You see, Mohawk. Henry is mine and there is not a damn thing you can do about it. He is coming home with me.’

Mohawk Mata – ‘Like hell he is. He stays right here with me. I have put out several videos of me and Henry virtually rolling in the hay, in a manner of speaking. Once the judge sees that, you will have about as much chance of canine custody as a snowball in hell.’

Joy Dehradun – ‘Henry it’s now or never. Remember that Elvis Presley classic?’ Joy begins to sing.

‘It’s now or never / Come hold me tight / Kiss me my darling / Be mine tonight and forever / Tomorrow will be too late / It’s now or never / My love won’t wait. Come on Henry, jump into my Merc.’

Henry – ‘I can’t come with you now, Joy. The Ethics Committee has called me for a hearing this afternoon. They’ve got a bone to pick with you, Mohawk and that Hero-none-the-wiser fellow, Mr. Moneybags. So they have promised to throw some chunky bones for me to pick on. I think I shall spill the beans, if not the bones. And please Joy, don’t try to cover Elvis, if you want me to come with you. Much better if you can belt out that old classic, How much is that doggie in the window, bow-wow. That is more within your vocal range. And mine.’

Joy Dehradun – ‘That is perfectly fine, Henry. You give that Ethics Committee hell but tell them your future lies with me. I will be waiting outside in my Merc. Just jump in at the back.’

Henry – ‘Who is that guy sitting in front? Didn’t know we had company.’

Joy Dehradun – ‘That is just my good friend, Rishicant ‘Scooby’ Dooby, who has been firing a few hot ones at Mohawk in parliament. Don’t worry, he is on our side.’

At which point, Mohawk Mata goes into a convulsive epileptic fit, recovers and dials that former cricketer’s son from a leading news channel and fixes an appointment for her 16^th interview with that same network. She then jumps on to the sofa where Henry was reclining and begins to wail her swan song. For a dog lover she elects, rather incongruously, to tearfully render Memory from Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Cats. However, the lyrics are appropriate and poignant, as the curtain comes down. There is no curtain call.

 ‘Memory, all alone in the moonlight / I can smile of the old days / I was beautiful then / I remember the time I knew what happiness was / Let the memory live again.’

The emotional impact of the song is completely ruined by the sound of a dog barking behind the curtains. Which respectable dog wants to hear a cat singing?

                                           THE END

My younger brother and I were kiddies between the ages of 5 and 9 when we spent a few years in Singapore and Kuala Lumpur in Malaya, as it then was. The reason being that my father, who worked in a private commercial bank (later nationalised), was posted in that part of the world for several years during the 50s. If I am still here to tell the tale, then you would have divined dear reader, with that sharp acuity that so characterises you, that I am well stricken in years. Not quite senile and doddering, but decidedly long in the tooth. As a family, we do have in our vaults, some faded black and white photographs taken during that period, to remind us of one of Britain’s many outposts that we called home for the greater part of a decade.

Prior to Kuala Lumpur and Singapore my dad was also stationed briefly in Rangoon where my older brother and I were with the pater and mater. I was too young to remember anything of Burma and my younger brother was still kicking and making a nuisance of himself in my mother’s womb. The photographs were not of the highest quality, and I am not just referring to the inevitable fading and spotting involved with bromide prints of that vintage, but also in terms of composition and character. ‘There, that’s me sucking my thumb on the far, left corner and that’s my brother sticking his tongue out as the cameraman asked us to watch the birdie.’ Not exactly from the Cartier-Bresson school of photography, but useful to spend an idle hour going through them. Particularly when you plan to revisit your past.

During these periodic reminiscences of mine, I have had occasion to go back and do a flashback on cities like Calcutta and London, and pen my thoughts as to how certain gradual changes have taken place in these cities. Always remembering that I am now based in Bangalore, a city I went back to, to put down roots, having spent my post-Far East childhood there. Nostalgia keeps claiming me for its own no matter how hard I try to stay rooted in the present. When you try to rediscover a city like Kuala Lumpur, having last lived there over six decades ago, expecting to instantly recognise familiar landmarks in a trice, is unrealistic. As I was to learn on this visit a couple of weeks ago.

To be perfectly honest, I had no real plan or desire to visit KL. ‘Let the dead past bury its dead,’ is my motto, as Longfellow put it so eloquently. Rediscovering something that happened within ten to thirty years ago is doable. The memory bank over that kind of time frame holds you in good stead, and the changes wrought in the city of your choice are never that drastic that you ‘have about as much chance as a one-armed blind man in a dark room trying to shove a pound of melted butter into a wild cat’s left ear with a red-hot needle.’ Now I put that in quotes because I have lifted it from one of Wodehouse’s gems. I have my principles. I do not go around pinching other people’s quotes, trying to pass them off as my own. Not cricket. To get back to the subject, my feelings on arriving at the capital city of Malaysia, where I had spent four years eons ago, was not dissimilar to Wodehouse’s one-armed blind man.

Nevertheless, I landed in KL to be met by my younger sibling, who had arrived earlier from Chennai with his better half, and her close relative settled in Malaysia. We were to spend about a week in the capital city, keen to visit every possible landmark that our fading memory and sepia-tinted old photographs would permit us to do. Our friends and relatives had thoughtfully drawn up a programme in advance to make our voyage of rediscovery as smooth as possible. However, there was a catch. The streets where we had lived all those years ago, the few landmarks to identify them by, had all vanished without a trace. More of that in a bit. One or two well- known tourist spots are still there in full splendour. Take Batu Caves for instance.

Batu Caves, the house of Lord Murugan, son of Shiva and his consort, Parvathi and brother of elephant-God Ganesha, was the scene of thousands of visitors. There was a temple at the base of a steep hill, and another darshan could be had if you had ventured to climb several hundred steps leading to the caves, to pay obeisance. Discretion won over valour and we decided to admire from afar and gaze in wonder at the gigantic, grand gold-painted statue of the presiding deity that towered over the entire area. Monkeys frolicked around, full of mischief, reminding one of the many temples in India. We also visited one or two Chinese places of worship and frankly, one looked just like the other. Chinatown was a must, selling all manner of cheap knacks and gewgaws, and most of the stalls were manned by Bangladeshis! Their Chinese masters just sat back, scratching themselves, enjoying their smoke and endless cups of tea, while raking in the ringgits.

My brother had an address we had apparently lived in, on the arterial Klang Road. We only had his word for it, though we did have a couple of photos of our bungalow with the entire family posing in front of it. Our friends showed great patience driving us around the vicinity of what might have been the location of our residence. What we came across instead were multi-storeyed buildings galore, a couple of shopping malls and a few tennis courts. I gave it as my considered opinion that those tennis courts might well have once been our picturesque bungalow! And if you don’t believe me, I can show you the pictures of those tennis courts. If that fails to convince you, you can view the photos of our bungalows. I have all bases covered.

Lest I forget, there was old La Salle School, which my brother and I attended for a couple of years, probably 2^nd and 4^th standard respectively. Our hosts reassured us that the school does indeed exist and is flourishing. Off we went, hunting for the school we barely remembered, aided only by a class group photo of mine which displayed the school banner at the back, but little else to mark it out by. On arriving, the guard at the gate firmly refused to let us in. I could not recall the school song, if there was one, else I would have sung it for him. I showed him the photo, he remained unimpressed, told me visitors not allowed. So, I stood outside the gate and clicked a few snaps. Frankly, for all I recalled, it could have been any school, but at least, I have something to show folks back home, how I first learnt a smattering of bad words in Malay and Chinese.

On some of our longer drives to Malacca and Genting (a pleasant resort with a casino attached), we hired a charming young Chinese couple to drive us around and act as tour guides. They were called Chini and China, I kid you not. Indeed, they were like a couple of cute Chinese pandas and I am guessing the latter was the man and Chini his wife. China (pronounced Cheena) could only drive and his English was non-existent, necessitating his young wife to be the official interpreter. Well, full marks to Chini for trying, but she might as well have been speaking to us in Mandarin or Cantonese or whatever. I tried a few bad Chinese words I had learnt in La Salle School on them, and they giggled. They both giggled a great deal which kept them and us in good spirits, and they got their Rs and Ls reversed (turn light, then reft and stlaight), an Oriental speech impediment we were familiar with and could decode. Happy campers. Incidentally, the Malaysians add a ‘la’ after every sentence. It is a kind of informal term of endearment. ‘KL is really hot, la. All twelve months, la. No winter, only rain. Even then very hot, la.’ Welcome to la-la land. By the way, try as we might, we could not find a souvenir shop in Malacca selling their storied Malacca cane of legend and song. Maybe we did not look hard enough. Too hot, la.

As you would have rightly concluded, my friends, our journey to Kuala Lumpur to delve into our past turned out to be somewhat of a non-starter. That said, our hosts and friends who remembered my parents with much fondness, were most hospitable, made us feel at home, took us round various parts of the city, and kept us well fed. We posed in front of that glitzy, architectural marvel, the imposing Petronas Towers, where superstar Rajanikanth and his ilk have often shot many of their action sequences, we posed in front of the even more imposing edifice of Lord Murugan (aka Subramanyan) in Batu Caves, a sprawling golf club here, a pan-Asian restaurant there, the ubiquitous Saravanabhavan hotels everywhere – all good. As to spotting anything even remotely resembling 88 Klang Road, our hearth and home circa 1955 – 58, we were chasing a mirage. A nice mirage, though. At least, we have the photographs to invest the mirage with some life.

So, if you are visiting Malaysia any time soon, never mind which part of the year, it will be hot. Too hot, la! But the people are velly, velly fliendry.

Carnatic musician T.M. Krishna has recently held forth on the perils, as he sees it, of music lovers inexorably leaning towards consuming the art form through a plethora of streaming OTT channels and eschewing live performances. Sitting comfortably at home, one can order entertainment, à la carte, often through state-of-the-art sound systems. Not to mention the all-pervasive mobile phone. ‘Spoilt for choice’ is an oft-repeated phrase. Krishna’s gripe is that increasingly, music lovers are becoming disinclined to attend live concerts, thereby denying themselves the opportunity to experience, along with others in the auditorium, the immediacy and thrill that a live performance promises. And, with caveats, delivers.

What Krishna posits is inarguable in theory. The facts on the ground may or may not bear this out. Since I have chosen to cite a Carnatic musician’s views, let me stick to the cloistered world of Carnatic music to take this discussion forward. Our world has come a long way over the decades, and there have been fundamental sociological and lifestyle changes. I am not an anthropologist, but that pretty much sums it up. I am keeping the Covid pandemic out of this purview, though it might have been a contributory factor in accelerating the process of keeping people out of concert halls. However, Covid was a black swan event and the scourge’s relevance to current behavioural patterns is virtually nil. Covid distorts the narrative.

YouTube and other digital platforms were not available back in the day, but radio was a hugely popular medium. All India Radio’s weekly National Programmes and morning offerings of Carnatic music were avidly anticipated. The tallest musicians gave of their time generously to these programmes, which only whetted the appetite of listeners to flock to concert halls to listen live to their favourite musicians. Vinyl records, cassette and spool tapes would circulate freely amongst friends and relatives who would wear them out listening to these masterpieces endlessly. If you were a Carnatic music aficionado back then, there was not much else happening to divert your attention.

Fast forward to the past couple of decades. If you look beyond the pandemic aberration, there are two factors that make attending concerts not quite the experience it once was. Just getting from one place to another has become arduous and a deterrent. In many metros, concert venues are located far apart and only those who live in the vicinity make the effort. Then there’s the parking woes, traffic navigation and the anxiety to return home. The exception is a city like Chennai, where many venues exist within shouting-distance of each other. This is particularly evident during the December music festival, when people move form venue to venue like those great historical migrations.

Krishna does make the point that a handful of musicians who enjoy box-office appeal, are the exceptions to the rule. I am not sure that this is a recent phenomenon. Even in the 60s and 70s, the venerable Music Academy Madras would find itself hard pressed to fill the hall for all but a few stars. It is possible that there were more stars then than there are now, though that is debatable. From about the early 80s till the mid-90s, there was a palpable lull in concert attendance, barring a few bankable artists. Thence, till well into the millennium years, there was a huge upsurge of interest with a host of young musicians breaking through the clutter. Concert halls were bursting at the seams.

This flies in the face of any sweeping generalisation that people are not inclined to attend live concerts. Quality finds its own level and rises to the top, like cream. Music lovers have become more selective and will attend concerts of artists they consider worth their while. The stresses and strains of modern life cannot be overemphasised. Then there is that hoary old chestnut, ‘are youngsters interested in Carnatic music?’ The question rhetorically suggests that they are not, but the conclusion is facile and fallacious. Sell-out concerts witness the presence of a more than respectable number of teenagers and those in their 20s and 30s whooping it up in their Ed Sheeran tee-shirts. ‘Awesome Kalyani, boss’ they WhatsApp to one another in the auditorium.

In conclusion, it is not anyone’s case that home viewing is a better form of experiencing music than a live performance, but needs must. Krishna opines, inter alia, that the virtual world is ‘a dangerous manifestation of reality, because it excludes person-to-person interaction. It is an intoxicating drug.’ That is a matter of opinion, but the virtual world is here to stay. Just as Krishna himself has self-avowedly admitted to being an integral part of that world, warts and all. An intoxicating drug? Many users are mainlining on it.

Deccan Herald, October 7, 2023.

‘What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.’ Cool Hand Luke.

(This story is being narrated by a retired government servant).

I am experiencing a few issues conversing with people below the age of 40 these days. Which is a dead giveaway that I am above 40 years old. As to how many years above 40 is for me to know and for you to preferably not find out. Don’t get me wrong. The sub-40 age groupers do speak English perfectly well, no problems there. I cannot vouch for their Tamil or Bengali. Even the words and phrases they use are ones that I am quite familiar with. So where is the hitch? Or glitch, if you prefer. I am not fussy, either way. It is the context that stumps me. The thing of it is, the way in which they employ their vocabulary drives me up the wall. I hear the words, I know the words, yet their import escapes me. You see what I just did there? I am already lapsing into a we / they binary, and that is not desirable while conversing in the same language with fellow humans. Sometimes I think I am losing it, then I tell myself if I cannot figure out what they are saying, then surely, they must be struggling to follow my conversational methods. That puts us on an even keel, and I must brace myself and be up for the challenge.

It is with such conflicting thoughts swirling around my head that I had the somewhat dubious pleasure of meeting a young gentleman, a chit of a lad really, while waiting at our friendly neighbourhood bank for the teller, or whatever they are called these days (cash dispenser?), to call me up for transacting my business. This young man, it was impossible for me to guess what his age might have been, sat next to me immersed in his mobile. Other than the inescapable fact that he was younger than me. Most people are. He was prematurely bald, which is the way with many of the younger generation nowadays, what with all the multi-tasking across time zones, shattered love lives and multiple woes besetting them.

 In which respect I had a head start over him, being blessed as I was with a full head of hair. Distinguished silver grey is my preferred description of my thatch, if that does not sound too vain. He was wearing a pair of faded denims with holes at the knees and his canary yellow tee-shirt had this bold legend, GO F*** YOURSELF! The three asterisks after the F were not typed by me to hide my queasiness, that is exactly how the tee-shirt announced itself and, by implication, announced the young wearer. Of course, he was completely absorbed in his iPhone. What did you expect? However, he turned towards me, smiled broadly and introduced himself.

‘Good morning, Sir,’ said he, ‘you can go before me, if you like. Like, I am just chilling.’ I was chuffed at the respect he was showing, but I declined. The air-conditioning at the bank was effective and I was not averse to a bit of chilling myself.

Ever so pleased he did not address me as Uncle. ‘No, no, you were here before me. Let us adhere to the time-honoured queueing tradition.’ I hoped the word ‘adhere’ did not confuse him.

‘Are you sure Sir? I am in no hurry. It is my off day from work.’

‘Day off, off day, that makes two of us. It is my day-off-day too. Every day is my off day. I am retired from service. I just need to be back home for lunch, which is still three hours away.’

The young man was not quite sure whether he should be happy for me or console me. I mean, in India many people feel it is the end of the world when they retire. ‘Well Sir, I guess you are enjoying your retired life. Must be cool, being able to watch all the cricket matches all day long.’

What’s with this affinity towards arctic climes? – cool, chill and so on. ‘There are more things in life than cricket matches,’ said I tartly. ‘Tennis, for a start. Anyway, what line of work are you in?’

‘I work for a software company here.’

‘But of course, why did I even bother to ask? You cannot throw a stone in Bangalore without striking some software chap or the other. But what is it that you do exactly in this software company? If that is not betraying confidences.’

He looked dubiously at me and proceeded to clear his throat, as if to say, you asked for it. ‘I write code, design apps for a variety of digital platforms, monitor their effectiveness on a continuous basis, and make course corrections, as and when. All this on behalf of various clients, our inputs uniquely tailor-made and applied for specific purposes. We charge them a bomb. By the hour.’ He then turned back to his mobile as if he had just told me what the time was.

‘Is that all?’ I asked, ‘or are you keeping things from me? Anyhow, if you will pardon a personal question, what are you paid for doing all that stuff that you just rattled off? Sounded most impressive, though I might need an English translation.’

‘It is a personal question, but no sweat. It varies from company to company but on average, perks and everything included, I would say I clean up around Rs.35 lakhs per annum. By the way, that is just my salary. The company charges the client in numbers you don’t want to know.’

‘How old are you? 21? And why are you bald? And why do you wear torn clothes? Can’t you afford something better? At that salary?’

‘So many questions. Let us just say I am older than 21 and leave it at that. We are all suffering from hair loss and IBS, that is irritable bowel syndrome, given the hours we keep and the tension involved. We work crazy hours, aligned to American timelines. As for the torn clothes, you won’t understand. Why are they taking so long? There are just two people in front of us.’

‘What is the hurry, young man? Plane to catch? Relax. You seem all frazzled. If you like, I will stand you a café au lait at the coffee shop next door, after this. You could use one. Cup, I mean. Or mug.’

‘Sorry, just a bit knackered. Yeah, coffee. That’s a thought.’

‘Fine, by the way what is your name?’

‘Rabindranath. You can call me Robbie.’

‘Bengali?’

‘Everybody asks me that. No, Kannadiga. It’s just that my parents hero-worshipped the bearded Bengali bard.’

‘Ah, where the mind is without fear etc. Bengali bearded bard, eh? Nice alliteration! By the by, I am Narasimhan. Call me Nari. Hooray, just one left in the queue. Last question Robbie, and I don’t mean to embarrass you. What is that printed on your tee-shirt?’

‘I am not embarrassed, Sir. You might be. What do you think that is, printed on my tee-shirt? Which part of it do you not understand?’

‘I couldn’t bring myself to utter that word.’

‘What word?’

‘That one starting with F and then blank, blank, blank. I mean, GO F*** YOURSELF! I am all for freedom of expression, but surely there are limits, young man. This is a bank. You can’t go around flaunting stuff like that on a tee-shirt.’

‘What? GO FREE YOURSELF!? What is your problem with that? Seriously.’

‘Is that what it is? Then why bother with the riddle, Robbie? Why not just spell it out?’

‘Where is the fun in that? It is called a teaser. You certainly got teased, didn’t you? Now I know how your mind works, begging your pardon.’

‘Thanks for nothing. Your number is flashing. And the coffee date is cancelled.’

Note: This retired person and the young software geek at the bank were all set for what at first seemed a love feast. The more they tried to talk to each other, the more things started breaking down. They spoke the same language, but they spoke in different tongues. The generation gap is a cliché, but it has a ring of truth to it. I am reminded of that great line from jazz singer and guitarist George Benson’s song The Masquerade, ‘We tried to talk it over, but the words got in the way.’

I don’t mind having a reputation as a serious and spiritual person. I think that would be a nice reputation to have. Russell Brand.

During my slaving days in an advertising agency in the 70s in Calcutta, we were required to work closely with market research organisations. Some of these research companies were spawned by the advertising agencies themselves and the research folks sat cheek by jowl with the ad crowd at the office. This was a clever way of keeping all the business revenue, advertising and research, under one corporate roof. All that changed many years down the road but that’s another story. One of the many rudimentary lessons I learned during my interactions with research professionals was that you need to be totally objective in framing your questionnaire such that no bias creeps in when you go around quizzing respondents. For instance, it simply won’t wash if you ask a question to a housewife on the lines of ‘Madam, we think Golcate toothpaste is harmful to your gums. Do you agree?’ You will be guilty of leading the respondent. The makers of Golcate toothpaste will sue you for every last paise. Let me get back to the res.

What has all this got to do with the price of fish? I hear you ask. I indulged myself somewhat merely to give you, the reader, the impression that I have been around, know my onions and will be treading on solid ground with respect to what is to follow. You see, I have been scratching my head these past few weeks trying to figure out who this Russell Brand chap is and why our newspapers here in India are so keen on featuring his life, sexual peccadilloes and court cases on a regular basis.

There are wild allegations about this gentleman, assuming he is one, apparently a millionaire television personality by profession and a dangerous and rapacious predator by inclination. Ask Katy Perry, not that I know who she is. A sort of Jekyll and Hyde character, this Brand, but most people seem to think he is more of a Hyde and Hyde character, the Jekyll side of him being conspicuously absent. My point being, why talk about this Russell Brand, who might be worshipped as an anti-hero for his wayward lifestyle back in the U.K. but is a total nonentity here in India? Do The Guardian, The Sunday Times or even the Daily Mirror headline page 3 with a picture story of one of our Bollywood stars, take your pick, having an ugly spat with one of their girlfriends? I think not. So why must The Times of India feed us stories of this Brand fellow and others of his ilk from the western world?

As a conscientious blogger, I decided to surf the net to glean a bit more about Russell Brand instead of relying solely on what could be dodgy newspaper reports. YouTube provided plenty of snippets about him and his extraordinary persona. One nugget I picked up was that he married singer Katy Perry in Rajasthan’s Ranthambore tiger sanctuary, under Hindu Vedic rituals! Divorced fourteen months later, presumably under American or British rituals. While all this was of academic and perhaps, prurient interest, it did not in any way, give me a clue as to why Indian audiences should be interested for our print media to waste so much editorial space on the man. To be fair, he talks fleetingly about practicing yoga but that is about as much of an Indian connection that I can gather (besides the Ranthambore tiger reserve wedding), and one heck of a stretch at that. I can understand if stories concerning Tom Cruise or Brad Pitt were to be featured. Many Indians do watch their movies and can relate to them, but Russell Brand is a closed book.

It was then that I said to myself that I should not allow my personal bias to cloud my judgement. It is entirely possible that I am some kind of weirdo who does not even know the first thing about the world-famous Russell Brand, and that he could very well be the main subject of conversation at every cocktail party in all the metro cities of India. Not in any party I have attended, but in every other party. I recently wrote a piece admitting my non-existent knowledge of pop diva Taylor Swift and her songs and had half my readers coming down on me like a ton of bricks berating my ignorance and calling me a moth-eaten fuddy-duddy. That is when I arrived at the conclusion that I should do a quick dipstick study (I can do the jargon) to ascertain what the level of awareness is with respect to brand Brand, in my neck of the woods.

As indicated earlier, having had some exposure to the way professional research is conducted, I decided to spare no effort to proceed diligently in asking the right questions (actually just the one question) to a set of people to elicit the level of Brand (pun intended) equity Russell enjoys in our country. Or not. Clearly, there was no need for me to travel all over India to do this. A small but representative sample size chosen with care should do the trick. I decided to go with the random sampling method. I am on a roll here, folks. Onward and upward!

To be on the safe side, I called up one of my old pals, a whiz in the research business, explained my dilemma, and sought her guidance on how to go about this Brand project. Incidentally, for reasons I cannot put a finger on, the market research business is dominated by the female of the species. Always has been. I can only put it down to their superior analytical prowess and empathy which enables them to draw people out of their shyness and start talking. Fair play to them, I say. There is hardly any point in embarking on a research exercise if you can’t get a sensible word out of the party of the second part, or the respondent. My friend, the research pro, asked me to proceed on my Russell Brand study strictly on pre-determined lines. I had made copious notes in my little black diary. I mean a leather-bound notepad with ruled pages, clip-on pencil and stuff. Not one of your digital affairs.

As soon as I stepped out of the main gate of my apartment block, I was to buttonhole the second human being I spied, and pose the question, ‘What does the name Russell Brand mean to you?’ Following this instruction to the T, I stopped a young lady who was ironing clothes for some customers in our block. She could only speak Tamil, but I had my instructions, and I could converse fluently in Tamil. Accordingly, I lapsed into the vernacular and posed the question to her about Russell Brand. She looked quite blank and mildly alarmed. Thus far, she had conversed only with my house maid. I took her awkward silence as a ‘don’t know,’ licked the tip of my lead pencil, jotted it down and proceeded down the road.

I then walked a little further, turned left and stopped at the third house on the right. This is called random selection. Whether I knew the resident of that house or not would have been entirely a matter of coincidence. In the event, I did not. I rang the bell, a dog barked and the door opened to reveal a well-dressed gentleman. As I did not look like a door-to-door salesman, he greeted me and let me in. The Jack Russell frisked about, sniffed at my ankles, thought better about lifting its hind leg, concluded I was not a threat and sat down next to me. ‘I will only take a minute, Sir. I am doing a small survey. I see your pet is a Jack Russell terrier. Speaking of which, does the name Russell Brand mean anything to you?’

‘I have heard of Russell Crowe. Good actor, Gladiator,’ replied the man of the house. ‘Would you care for a cup of tea?’

‘Thank you, Sir. I have taken enough of your time. I have more visits to make. Another time, perhaps.’

He saw me off at the door, with the Jack Russell yapping away in the background. Given the level of response so far, I may as well have asked the terrier what he thought of Russell Brand.

Still, ours not to reason why. I took out my little notepad and sauntered off in the direction of my next stop. ‘Take the second turning right and halt at the third bungalow on the left.’ I did that and faced a Nepali security guard who viewed me with suspicion. Since there was not much point asking him if he was aware of one R. Brand, I requested him to show me into the palatial bungalow. After what seemed an eternity while he spoke on the intercom, a sprightly teenage girl wearing a Coldplay tee-shirt skipped out and told me her Mummy and Papa were out of the country and could she be of any help. This was the light at the end of the tunnel. The Coldplay tee-shirt won the day. ‘What do you know about Russell Brand?’ I queried.

‘I know zilch about him, but my friend in London says he is a perv, but quite sexy. That is all I can tell you.’

Didn’t quite strike pay dirt, but near enough. Job done. I could have hugged her but wiser counsel prevailed. She might have taken me for a local avatar of Russell Brand. Thanked her profusely and departed, the Nepali guard still eyeing me warily. Literally putting one foot in front of the other, I completed seven more planned random encounters, including one with a Dunzo courier, who was chatting with his girlfriend on his mobile, and who abused me in guttersnipe Kannada. I decided to call it a day, came home and conducted ten telecom interviews asking the same question to people I did not know from Russell Brand. Without exception, all of them cut me off, one of them threatening to make a police report about a crank caller.

There you have it, my friends. I ask again. If no one in India, or at least in my two-kilometre radius, consisting of a representative sample in Bangalore, knows anything about Russell Brand, why is my daily newspaper so wrapped up in him? It’s not as if he is Justin Trudeau or something. Not to put too fine a point on it, I too must wonder why I spent so much time writing about this non-entity. Duh!

I was fiddling with my mobile phone a couple of days ago, since most of us have nothing better to do these days, when I came across one of those short videos that had gone viral, as the expression is, rather like dengue or the Zika virus. The Instagram or Tik-Tok reel was about a couple of minutes long and featured a fetching young lady, walking around a new premium liquor outlet that had just opened its doors somewhere in a ritzy suburb of Mumbai. It was a promo, of course, and the lady in question was introducing the viewer to this luxury wine and liquor store. The word luxury is a much-abused term to mean anything that is perceived as upper crust, rare and consequently obscenely expensive. The more expensive, the more the luxury quotient kicks in. While mine hostess was jabbering away breathlessly about single malts and vintage wines, she stopped in front of a swank, blood-red Ferrari, parked plumb spang in the middle of the store. It was not clear if the car itself was up for sale, but the general idea seemed to be to accentuate the luxury feel in the store. And what better than a Ferrari, to a. the l.f. A bit out of place I thought, a car in a wine shop but what the hell, drinking and driving is kosher in the luxury segment. The number of Audis, Mercs, BMWs and Jaguars, under the ministrations of sozzled millionaires that have climbed pavements, wrapped themselves round trees and lamp posts, slaying six, are too numerous to mention.

However, since this is a wine store and not a retailer for upmarket automobiles, we were also helpfully informed that customers will be waited upon by sommeliers to aid the process of selecting the right libation for their specific needs and palates. Note the ostentatious choice of the word sommelier, which is nothing more than a fancy French expression for a waiter who can gab on endlessly about wines and spirits, in the process confounding our confusion. What is more, if you are a wine connoisseur, and even if you are not, this is probably the only such store in the country (if the girl is to be taken at face value) where you can actually sample a variety of wines and / or spirits before making up your mind which brand of potion you wish to lavish your ill-gotten gains on.

The girl on screen was doing precisely that, sampling the stuff while still steady on her feet, and gradually, almost imperceptibly becoming incoherent towards the end of the film. ‘Neapolitan, sorry Napoleon brandy, cognac, what’s the difference, 1875 vintage, fill quarter of the goblet, no ice and swirl, swirl, swirl, inhale the fumes and down the hatch. Neat? Hic! Sorry. Retake yaar!’ Some outlets in big airports like Heathrow or Charles de Gaulle provide this kind of exclusive service at their duty-free shops. The passenger, probably travelling business or first class, is looking for something rare to take home. He sips from one goblet, takes a swig from another, downs a third and before he knows it, the sommelier, whose small talk is as smooth as the drinks being purveyed, has convinced the sodden sod to buy all three bottles. Nice work, if you can get it.

The one thing that impresses me most is the amount of knowledge these fast-talking liquor sales folk have garnered and how persuasively they can communicate the various subtleties of the beverage they are promoting. (‘Feel the nutty walnut and cashew flavour in this dry sherry.’) It is almost insidious. Before you can say ‘bottoms up,’ you are eating out of their hands. More accurately, drinking out of their hands. Most of the sommeliers I have come across, even those outside the United Kingdom, appear to have been recruited from the U.K. That is quite understandable, English being the lingua franca of the world. Chances are many of them must have started life out in English pubs, serving veteran elbow-benders and moved on to higher things. It is also possible they have special schools for training in the field of liquor small talk, so you come out with a degree, your head crammed with deep insights on the subtle intricacies of el vino.

Speaking for myself, though not a toper by any stretch of the imagination, you will not find me averse to indulging in the odd drop of vin rouge or vin blanc, if the occasion calls for it. However, it is the conversational gambit of these sales chappies at the duty-free counters that fascinates me. It is an extraordinary amalgam of knowledge, wit and banter that cunningly inveigles you into their web. Come into my parlour, said the spider to the fly. Next thing you know, you are a goner, three bottles heavier and a few hundred pounds lighter. And there’s still the chocolates and perfumes left to take home.

I have been an active witness to a couple of these encounters, notably at London Heathrow’s exclusive Terminal 5, reserved only for British Airways. Walking into one of these spacious duty-free spaces, redolent of rich wines and single-malts combined with ‘all the perfumes of Arabia.’ I was clear that I will merely loaf around the shop, admiring the big brands and vowing to myself that earthquakes will not loosen a pound coin out of my pocket. A voice spoke from behind me.

‘Good morning, Sir. Are you looking for anything in particular or can I guide you in any way?’ He spoke impeccably, could have been an Englishman from Oxbridge, though why an Oxonian or a Cantabrigian should be selling wines at Heathrow was not for me to reason why. In the event, he turned out to be a young Sikh lad, probably from Southall. Gurmeet, his badge proudly announced. For some reason, they don’t display surnames. I was wondering if he would suddenly break into some popular Punjabi rap. Rapper Gurmeet.

‘Hi Gurmeet,’ I responded chattily. It was good to see an Indian face, though truth be told, he was no more Indian than Rishi Sunak. ‘Just browsing, not that this is a book shop or anything, ha ha.’

‘No Sir, not a book shop,’ responded Gurmeet tartly. ‘Could I interest you in some fine wines, Sir? If you could step this way, I will introduce you to Reginald, our highly qualified sommelier this morning. He will take you through some of our best wines and perhaps something even stronger. Reg, please help our guest travelling to India, I think. Ta.’

Gurmeet sidled out of sight and I was left with Reg and half-a-dozen bottles of varying shapes and sizes, plus several sparkling goblets. We were all set for a right, royal booze-up. Reg cleared his throat. His parents migrated to the U.K. from Jamaica during the 50s, so there was not a trace of the Michael Holding accent in him. More like Benedict Cumberbatch, if you closed your eyes.

‘Good morning once again, Sir. As Gurmeet has just told you, I will introduce each of these exclusive brands briefly, at the end of which you will be invited to sample them. And depending on which of these superb offerings you decide to buy, we will be giving a special 25% discount. With your permission, I will begin.’

‘Er, I am not sure I will buy anything. So my sampling your wares should not be conditional upon an actual purchase. I wish to make that clear at the outset.’ I was glad I got that off my chest. I mean, a Chateau Lafite 1956, priced at 1550 pounds discounted at 25%. They were virtually giving it away!

Reg was most polite. ‘No problem, and if you don’t mind my asking Sir, are you travelling Business or First Class?’

That got my dander up. ‘What has that got to do with anything, Reg? If you must know I am travelling cattle class. Is that a problem?’

‘Not at all Sir.’ He was a bit flustered. ‘It’s just that we have special offers for First and…oh, never mind. Let’s turn our attention to the drinks.’ In this vein, he carried on, offering me generous sips from different brands of wine (I have had tastier cough syrups), whisky and liqueur until I had become cross-eyed. In fairness, he had placed a silver spittoon next to me. Apparently, I was supposed to spit out the liquor sample into it, after the customary swirl in the mouth, but I kept swallowing the stuff. I wasn’t even listening to his endless banter. I could only hear the sommelier droning on about the pluses and minuses of corks and screwcaps, ’99 Canalicchio Brunello, Napa valley, 2% Petit Verdot, sedimentation and so on. I could barely stand, but I managed to blurt out, ‘Thanks very much, my old sommelier. You can talk the talk, though I can barely walk the walk. Tell you what, I shall pick up that mini bottle of Bailey’s Irish Cream. 3 quid? You will give it free? You are a prince among men, Reginald, and I shall write to your bosses telling them so.’

Feeling flushed, I staggered out towards Gate 47, 11 minutes by foot the digital sign said. Woof! And not a courtesy transport, golf cart in sight.

I commenced my trudge. Stirred, but not shaken.

One of the most exciting tasks that a married couple anticipates is the arrival of the proverbial stork with their first born, or for that matter, second or even third born. Rarely in our straitened times do couples go for more than two kids, three being a bit of a stretch, probably accidental. Unless, of course, you are Elon Musk, in which case after the announcement of the birth of the eleventh baby, he has just got down to spitting on his hands and getting into his stride. More of Musk anon. It is superfluous to add that in our enlightened age, marriage is not a necessary pre-condition to add to the world’s head count. In fact, as a wedded couple you are not even called upon to be of a different sexual orientation. Same sex couples can have children, just like anybody else. That should cover the whole gamut, unless some new development has taken place in the sphere of human behaviour and physiology that has escaped my attention.

My preoccupation this week is more to do with how couples and their near and dear ones get into a right, royal tizzy over what to name the impending arrival along with the patter of little feet. Those who do not wish to know in advance the sex of their bundle of joy that is still blissfully swimming in its mother’s amniotic fluids, run around with reference books while frantically Google searching, scouring names of boys and girls. In any case, Indian law does not allow parents to know the baby’s gender in advance. Depending on which religious denomination you belong to, Hindu, Christian, Muslim, Sikh, Parsee, Jain, Buddhist or any other, there are loads of names for you to sift through during those nine months of cozy captivity for our little wonder.

Fierce debates rage in the homestead as all kinds of names are scattered about like so much confetti. If it happens to be a boy, Amar, Akbar or Anthony or their variants should do just fine. Sticking with the Bollywood motif, if it’s a girl, one could turn to that notorious vamp Bindu’s cabaret dance line from the 1971 hit film Kati Patang, ‘Neena ya Meena, Anju ya Manju, yaaa Madhu!’ Not that it makes a blind bit of difference, but the vamp’s name in the film is Shabnam, though she is affectionately called ‘Shabbo.’  That is a translation from the opening line of the song. The context is different but still, I think you can see where I am going with this.

To further complicate matters, many couples are keen on nailing both the official registered name for the baby as well as a nick name or pet name. ‘Right, we have all settled on Krishnamoorthy Venkatasubramanian as the final name, if it is a boy, as it incorporates in some shape or form the names contained in the father’s and mother’s family genealogy. However, he shall be known as Kittu to the world. If he migrates to the United States and becomes a billionaire software czar and covets the White House, he shall change his name to Kittu Venky. The same rules apply if the arrival is a girl. Full name, Anahita Ambegaonkar, converted in America to Annie Amby.’ This principle will hold irrespective of which religion the child belongs to. As an aside, I find it rich when Americans moan about difficulties in pronouncing Indian names with more than three syllables, and find the need to shorten them, Yank style. What about former U.S. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski then? Wrap that round your tongue.

The process of naming a child, in this modern age when the world is our oyster, or as the poet Wordsworth had it, ‘the world is too much with us,’ has become somewhat universalised. Westerners, who notoriously make a fuss about pronouncing names from the southern hemisphere, have become just that much more familiar. They still behave as if the cat has caught their tongues, but they muddle through. Kamala Harris poses no problem, that’s easy-peasy, Vivek  Ramaswamy is rapidly gaining currency with frequent appearances on American television debates. Britain’s Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is a walk in the park, though his first lady Akshata Murty could prove a handful, if not a mouthful. To the native Brit that is, not to the Asian migrants.

For reasons I am unable to articulate, Indians in India celebrating the impending new arrival with a ‘baby shower,’ a western concept, seems little more than something the marketing mavens of the gifting industry have showered upon us, to expand their business by showering the baby with gifts. Not unlike the ad blitz inflicted on an unsuspecting world on Valentine’s Day. There are those that aver that the idea of a baby shower was originally inspired by ancient Greek and Egyptian rituals. In traditional India, there are certain ceremonies held when the woman is still ‘carrying,’ but we tend to go a bit soft on the gifts!

Now that we have turned to the subject of names in the western hemisphere, I cannot but talk at greater length about Elon Musk and his rapidly expanding familial empire. While I have touched briefly upon the Indian diaspora and the unique challenges that their names could pose to a western audience, the Twitter now X mogul, Elon Musk, has blazed a new and enthralling trail when it comes to naming his eleven offspring. Across three partners (Justine, Grimes and Shivon Gillis), the prolific Musk has fathered eleven children, and I would not bet against more in the pipeline – more partners and more children.

While one gasps at the great magnate’s fecundity, it is more the names his children were burdened with that is noteworthy. Try these on for size. Nevada Alexander Musk, twins Griffin and Vivian Musk which was more conservative, Kai, Saxon and Damian Musk, X AE A-XII Musk (I kid you not), Exa Dark Siderael Musk, nicknamed Y as X AE A-XII had already appropriated the nickname X (makes sense), Strider and Azure Musk and the latest arrival, Techno Mechanicus, nicknamed (what choice did they have?) Tau. Somewhere along the way, they sadly lost Nevada, then resorted to IVF, Vivian declared she was a transgender, the IVF a second time produced triplets, the abovementioned Kai, Saxon and Damian.

At which point Elon and his first wife Justine decided she had had enough and separated, something the Americans do with elan. So with Elon. Presumably Grimes and Shivon Gillis are still in the frame, but honestly, my guess is as good as yours. If you have been able to make cogent sense out of all that, you are a better man than I am, Gunga Din. Overall, not that I am much of a Bollywood follower, I can’t help but paraphrase one of their big hit numbers in doffing my hat to the productive Elon, ‘Tu cheez badi hai Musk, Musk.’ Loosely translated, in case you are reading this Elon, it means ‘You are great, awesome, awesome!’

One thing that really gets my goat with Americans is when the father and the son are given the same name, as in George Bush Sr. and George Bush Jr. It gets no easier when both of them become President of the U.S.A. Obviously not at the same time, but still. In casual conversation at a party for instance, someone says something like, ‘That was quite a victory for George Bush.’ Your natural response to that comment would be, ‘Which George Bush are you referring to? The one that freed Kuwait of Saddam Hussein’s occupation or the one that smoked out Saddam from a hidey-hole somewhere in Iraq, leading to his execution?’ See what I mean? Merely affixing a Sr. or a Jr. just doesn’t cut it. That is taking the lazy way out. I know there is an H.W. and a W that splits the difference between father and son, but that doesn’t help. And why John Kennedy was called Jack at home is even more of a mystery, what with his wife being called Jackie. Ours not to reason why, I suppose.

If it was just the newborn’s name that parents and elders tear their hair out coming to grips with, that is nothing compared with the argy-bargy that goes on in relation to how to spell the name. This is particularly relevant in the Indian context where superstition and old wives’ tales count for a lot. The baby arrives on schedule, spittle generously foaming around the mouth, gurgling away while everybody goes coochy-coo. The father rushes in, brandishing a sheet of paper and announces with much fanfare, ‘I have it. From this day forth he shall be called Nikhil. I have checked it out with the priest. It’s all kosher and official. We can always call him Nikki or Niks at home.’ The mother then peers at the sheet of paper, smeared with sacred ash and kum kum, bearing the bold legend NIKHIL, scrunches up her face and says calmly, ‘The H will have to go. We cannot go beyond five letters, and my family guru says H, being the eighth letter of the English alphabet, portends ill luck. So let us settle on NIKIL.’ Given that the change suggested was not drastic, everyone agrees with a sigh of relief. This is a common occurrence in millions of households around the country. If the baby is a girl, the name could be Riya, Ria or even Rhea. It is all written in the stars.

When all is said and done, the newborn is the victim here, having no say in the matter whatsoever, lumbered with a name he or she will have to live with forever. Techno Mechanicus for crying out loud, you want to change your name? You can, but have a care. Your super rich dad could cut you out of his will and where will you be? What is the point of changing your name to John Doe if you are going to be left skint? Remember what Shakespeare said? ‘What’s in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet.’ Though on this occasion, I would prefer to sign off with James Joyce, ‘What’s in a name? That is what we ask ourselves in childhood when we write the name that we are told is ours.’

Way to go James, or should that be Jim?

India is a fascinating country. Dear me, did I just unknowingly drop an inadvertent brick? Should I have said Bharat is a fascinating country? Or, to hedge my bets and err or the side of caution, should I have said India, that is Bharat, is a fascinating country? Keep both sides happy? Damned if I do and damned if I don’t. That seems to be the predicament in which I find myself. As do many others who are trying to figure out what this India and Bharat palaver is all about.

How did this controversy over our beloved nation’s nomenclature erupt suddenly out of the blue? If media reports are anything to go by, and that is a big ‘if,’ it all apparently started with an innocuous invitation for dinner. The moot point is that the invitation, which was from our President, no less, to the visiting Heads of State and VIPs attending the G20 Summit in New Delhi, was issued by and captioned ‘The President of Bharat.’ This set the cat among the pigeons. I should mention, in passing, that the official logo unit of the G20 Summit incorporates both the names of Bharat, calligraphed in the traditional Devanagari script and India, capitalized in English. An even-handed approach ensuring both terms co-exist harmoniously side by side, as blessed by the Constitution. Pitchforking Bharat to the forefront, almost seamlessly (some may even say slyly) via the Presidential dinner invite was clearly the brainchild of the Government without drawing ostentatious attention to itself. That did not quite work as it stood out like a sore thumb. The Cassandras, read the Opposition parties, spotted it quickly enough and all hell broke loose.

I have no wish to go into the alleged chicanery of the Government in bringing Bharat into the spotlight in this fashion, nor do I have any interest in expounding upon the inconsistencies involved in the argument adduced by those who smell a big, fat bandicoot behind this move, claiming that it is to divert attention away from the Opposition’s political combo, the collective I.N.D.I.A, which appears to be gaining some traction. Keeping Adani off the headlines was also casually thrown into the mix. On balance, whatever the motive, the Government appears to be perfectly within its rights to employ the term Bharat, which has been enshrined in the Constitution.

Patriotic songs in the vernacular including the National Anthem, extol the virtues of Bharat and not India. That is such a no-brainer it does not even need to be explained. There are enough examples from the north of the Vindhyas to bolster this thought, both in classical and film music. Even in the more arcane world of Carnatic music from the South, a certain Mayuram Viswanatha Sastri composed a song called ‘Jayati Jayati Bharata Mata’ in the raga Khamas which was popularised back in the day during the 50s by Carnatic music’s then poster boy and genius, G.N. Balasubramaniam. One can hardly imagine anyone rendering this song as ‘Jayati Jayati India Mata,’ God forbid. Any more than you can chant ‘India Mata ki Jai.’ Other famous doyennes like Bharat Ratna (not India Ratna) M.S. Subbulakshmi and Padma Vibhushan D.K. Pattammal have rendered numerous songs on Bharat on either side of our Independence, particularly those composed by freedom fighter, social reformer and poet, Subramania Bharati. The name Bharati, incidentally, was an affectionate and respectful appellation, and he was often referred mononymously as simply Bharatiyar. His songs and poems moved millions. At least, they did in south Bharat.

Proponents of the more elaborate use of the term Bharat also point to various cities in India having been named differently with nary a whimper raised. Madras and Chennai, Bombay and Mumbai, Calcutta and Kolkata, Trivandrum and Thiruvananthapuram are frequently cited. This trend is not confined to India alone. There are many similar examples on the global map. As is his wont, if we are to ‘credit’ the Prime Minister with this move, he has given no indication that there is a concerted effort to amend the name of the country officially, which will also most likely involve a constitutional amendment, to be approved by Parliament. A headache he can do without. Then again, he is known to play his cards close to his chest. The Opposition’s quandary is that it can only criticise the Government for its real or imagined motive behind the move, and not for freely using the name Bharat. Astute intellectuals opposed to the idea, who have committed their thoughts on the subject to print, need to be mindful that they do not paint themselves into a corner from which it might prove problematic to wriggle out, the ruling party ever ready to pounce and brand them as unpatriotic.

Where Hindustan that is Bharat that is India fits into all this, I do not know, but should be fit for another hornet’s nest of a punch-up. I have little doubt some learned historian has explained all this in considerable detail. For now, we should be grateful the discussion has been confined to just two names.

While fanatic followers of the Indian cricket team often chant ‘Indiaaaa, India,’ in unison on cricket fields around the world, when our fans decided to take a leaf out the English cricket groupies’ brand ‘Barmy Army,’ our patriots hit upon the idea of calling themselves ‘Bharat Army,’ the name boldly emblazoned on the tricolour. The two terms, India and Bharat have coexisted harmoniously and interchangeably. One might add here that some famous Indian cricketers like Gavaskar and Sehwag have weighed in behind the Idea of Bharat. M.S. Dhoni could not be reached for a comment as he was enjoying Alcaraz’s brilliance at the U.S. Open followed by a round of golf with President Donald Trump! (Is there more in this unusual pairing than meets the eye?) The Bharat vs India debate is a capacious bandwagon onto which everyone can jump. Trust our politicians, irrespective of party affiliation, to put a vicious spin on the whole issue allowing the matter to literally spin out of control.

The political pot, always simmering, boiled over last week when actor-turned-politician, Tamil Nadu’s DMK Chief Minister M.K. Stalin’s son Udayanidhi, likened our core Hindu philosophy, Sanatana Dharma, to rampant diseases like dengue, malaria and the corona virus, asking for its eradication – the Dharma that is, not the diseases. As the terms ‘eradicate’ and ‘disease’ are by way of being joined at the hip, it was an unfortunate choice of words by the young scion. Having reflected on his outpourings and deciding he had to go the whole hog, he has now called the BJP ‘a poisonous snake.’ Expect more fireworks. Simply put, Udayanidhi’s intemperate remarks have got him into hot water, landed him right in the soup. Or to put it in terms that he is more likely to be familiar with, dunked him in some hot and spicy rasam. However, he and his paterfamilias are digging their heels in and refusing to budge from their stated position. Reverting to the old ruse of claiming he has been misunderstood and is being quoted out of context. Poor lamb.

To add fuel to the fire, senior DMK functionary, A. Raja, no stranger to controversy himself, went one better and gave it as his considered opinion that Sanatana Dharma is as bad, if not worse than AIDS and leprosy. One wonders what drives these motormouths to utter such arrant nonsense. It was at best politically inept and maladroit, possibly politically suicidal – something the I.N.D.I.A collective, of which the DMK is an important cog, needed like a hole in the head. It is hardly surprising that other major constituents of I.N.D.I.A are rapidly distancing themselves from this fracas. To add to the confusion, any number of scholars and Indologists are expansively and contrarily holding forth on the real meaning of Sanatana Dharma. Net result? Nobody is any the wiser.

As if all this were not enough to keep us fully occupied and entertained, enter stage left One Nation, One Election (‘but you can call me ONOE.’) Pursued by a bear or not, I cannot be sure. The aim is to hold Assembly and Central elections in one fell swoop, and be done with it.  The Prime Minister, in his usual way, came up with a googly while his opponents were expecting the ball to go straight on. It was announced, taking everyone aback, that a special session of Parliament has been called later this month, agenda unspecified. Our speculation factory then went on overdrive, particularly by the print and electronic media. Topping the bill was the ONOE issue (with the Women’s Reservation Bill and possibly the Uniform Civil Code to follow), which has been informally talked about for some years now, and irate members of the Opposition went to town writing reams about the unsuitability and unworkability of the scheme.

The silver-tongued, articulate Congress MP, Shashi Tharoor led the anti-ONOE brigade, writing columns on the subject. That said, he has been unstinting in his plaudits for those in the Government who burned the midnight oil to achieve a favourable outcome at the G20 Summit. Tharoor’s party leader, Rahul Gandhi, revels in taking pot shots at his homeland from a safe distance outside the country, and not for the first time. Others followed suit, presumably in a bid to pre-empt and thwart any such attempt by the ruling party. One assumes Rahul Gandhi will soon return to resume his I.N.D.I.A Jodo Yatra. And we still haven’t a clue what these special sessions are all about. Spewing fire and brimstone was the order of the day, which has been doused somewhat by the enormous optics offered by the G20 Summit (Yippee, the Delhi Declaration happened, Putin and Xi notwithstanding).

Clearly, the main talking point from the Opposition has been to establish that the ONOE policy is impractical and will result in a huge waste of national resources, which runs counter to the Government’s USP on the subject, viz., achieving economies of scale being the primary selling point. It is worth reflecting here that till 1967, both State and General elections were conducted simultaneously. The point appears to have been lost somewhere in the dense thicket of mass verbiage. So what are we dealing with here? A special session of Parliament in the offing, for which no one even remotely knows the agenda.  But everyone is happy to fly kites, play guessing games and shoot in the dark and hope some stray bullet will hit the target. Right now, everyone is shooting blanks. We can only hope that the Opposition members participate in a lively discussion, if at all ONOE is placed on the agenda, and not stage a walk-out in a huff because the PM is not addressing the House on Manipur.

Whatever be the outcome of all these issues that constantly keep us on our toes, I daresay there will be many more to come. We in India, that is Bharat, will never lack for something to talk and write about. With State and General Elections just around the corner, our cups of joy should be overflowing. I rather feel like S.T. Coleridge’s Kubla Khan, For he on honey-dew hath fed /And drunk the milk of Paradise. That is a bit of a stretch but put it down to poetic license.

Bring them on, I say. I am all ready and agog in front of my television set, my favourite dailies rustling by my side, and a large tub of popcorn or spicy snacks  to keep my gastric juices flowing smoothly. It is going to be one heck of a ride, folks. Lie back and enjoy it.

I have come to grips with one of the great verities of life. It is that your desire to get rid of detritus collected over the years at home, deliberately or inadvertently, grows in inverse proportion to the intention of doing away with it. Like Topsy from Uncle Tom’s Cabin, I think it just ‘grow’d.’ I use the word detritus somewhat loosely. When you have lived for well nigh seven decades and a bit, all kinds of things tend to accumulate. Not really detritus, but possibly timed-out. At the time, they are considered precious and indispensable. Having salted them away, you have barely had the time to revisit the cache. They are kept carefully in shoe boxes, biscuit tins, dark corners in cupboards and drawers, secreted away in suitcases caked with grime and dust, that have not seen the light of day since Noah’s Ark opened its doors to its varied paired fauna. Times without number you have said to yourself, and to your wife, ‘I must get down to do some serious spring cleaning. There’s just too much stuff lying around taking up space.’ The sardonic laugh is from the wife, who herself has much to think about when it comes to cleaning out her invaluable collectibles.

With that pious thought and fully aware that the road to hell is paved with good intentions, I start attempting to sort out the various accumulated articles and knick-knacks. This is how they stack up, category-wise, and I spend more time thinking about what to do with them than in actuality accomplishing anything in the way of discarding them.

Books. There are now so many books around the house, literally bursting out of every nook and cranny. Our staircase to the terrace could be in danger. Let me get cracking. The local lending library will be pleased to get a trunkful of these books. Let’s see. There are 61 novels of P.G. Wodehouse. Can’t touch them. I would rather commit hara-kiri than part with any of Plum’s masterpieces. As far as I am concerned, they are all masterpieces. I must admit many of the Jeeves / Wooster and Blandings Castle escapades are coming apart at the seams, the white-ants have got to them, but I am damned if I am giving any of them away.

What’s this? The Golden Treasury of Longer Poems, presented to S. Suresh, winner of the school elocution contest 1963. You see what I mean? Then there’s Amis, Kingsley and Martin, Spike Milligan, The Complete Works of Italian crime writer, Andrea Camilleri, Christopher Hitchens, Julian Barnes, Ian McEwan, some old Perry Masons, Louis L’Amours and Agatha Christies, learned volumes from my advertising days and so much more. Not to mention books written by my friends and relatives (everybody is publishing books these days). Tell you what, all the fat Encyclopaedias can go for a start, ditto voluminous autobiographies (they are so full of themselves), don’t need so many Wisdens (I can get all the cricket statistics from Google). That should be a decent start for clearing up. I can review the situation a year down the road.

Lest I forget, there is an Eng. Lit. topper at home, namely, my better half whose books occupy several shelves. From Austen and Bronte to Camus and Turgenev, Dumas to Dickens and Eliot – George and T.S. to Mann and Salinger. And that is barely skimming the surface. Shakespeare’s Complete Works is not a space saver either. Can’t touch any of them. And here’s a laugh. I too have published books comprising a compilation of my pieces. Since no one buys them, barring a handful of diehard loyalists, I purchase boxfuls of them at volume discounts and periodically gift them to unwary friends and visitors to our wee home (you are duly cautioned). Those boxes take up space as well.

Finally, the airport pot-boilers for flights. Follet, Baldacci, Cook, Clancy, Francis – you get the drift. From the sublime to the ridiculous, there’s also a stack of comics and Mad magazines to deal with. Net result, after spending over two hours, I have managed to cull out a measly 17 books to dispose of. If I must buy a book in the interim, it will have to be Kindle or some such. More’s the pity.

Compact Discs & DVDs. Music and all manner of film entertainment is a passion with me. Having graduated from vinyls, spool tapes and cassette tapes, VHS tapes and finally CDs and DVDs, I felt I had reached the apogee of technology delivering hi-definition music and drama for home entertainment. Then came the audio and video streaming devices delivering the best of music and films the world had to offer, rendering all my CDs and DVDs redundant overnight. I am now sitting on a mountain of over 700 CDs and DVDs of some of the best and brightest, not knowing what to do with them. Barring a handful of titles, pretty much all of them are streaming on Spotify, Amazon, Netflix, Apple and several other channels. It breaks my heart to throw them all away as the market for same is worse than bearish, and every time I pick up a CD of Bob Dylan or Joan Baez or the Fawlty Towers DVD box-set, I hastily slot them back into the shelf. It’s a good job I stopped buying CDs over five years ago. Incidentally, my CD player went on the blink recently, and there’s no one to repair it. This is a quandary I will have to live with. Does not help the space problem, but that is my problem.

Letters. No one writes letters these days, not for the past 15 years, give or take. I mean with a pen on sheets of paper. It’s all on email or junk mail. However, things were different way back when. Postcards, picture postcards, inland letters, bulky letters arriving in buff envelopes, starting from school friends writing in during holidays, parents writing to us when we were incarcerated in boarding school, pen pals, letters from across the seas and so much more. Because of the effort and trouble taken to sit down and write these letters, we could never throw them away. They are all there in various boxes. It is now time to take stock as you may not want these personal missives to be lying around when you are no longer amongst those present. But when you get down to re-reading them in order to start tearing them up, nostalgia claims you for its own and instead, you start tearing up! In the words of the Bard, ‘letting “I dare not” wait upon “I would,” like the poor cat i’ the adage.’

Miscellany. If books and music have the capacity to give us everlasting pleasure, I am not sure of some of the gewgaws that seem to find their way into every available space around the home. A weathered Cotswold stone from somewhere in those picture-perfect Cotswold villages, some sea shells and pebbles from a beach in the Costa Brava (I have seen more shells on the Marina Beach in Madras), a withered feather from I know not where that serves as a bookmark, theatre and cinema tickets (The Absent-Minded Professor, The Minerva, Calcutta), bus and train tickets from all parts of the globe, even a 20p tram ticket from Calcutta (the no.24 that ferried me to college at the crack of dawn), my late Cocker Spaniel’s dog collar and identity badge – there’s no end to it. Photographs, tons of them. Need to get them digitized. Soon as I put this article to bed, I will be slapping my forehead exclaiming, ‘Gosh, I forgot to include Christmas and New Year greeting cards with all those twee messages, two large-size envelopes full of them. And like letters, greeting cards are also now an almost extinct species what with all the moving images we can conjure from the internet.

In conclusion, I guess what I am striving to communicate is that we humans are inveterate collectors of things. Any ‘things.’ Trying to get rid of them is a mug’s game. It’s over four years since I last examined my hidden treasures. One of these days I will get down to it, but the result will be the same. I will come over all misty-eyed and put them all back. Someone called Josie Brown is credited with saying, ‘The key to spring cleaning is to be ruthless. Throw out anything and everything you never use.’ Sooner you than me, Josie, sooner you than me.

Two events occurred, serendipitously, over the past week, gazillion miles apart, that had pretty much the whole of India’s 1.4 billion people on the edge of their seats. The Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) pride and joy, Chandrayaan-3, was hurtling towards the south pole or the dark side of the moon, orbiting closer and closer to the landing site of the golden orb, as we waited with bated breath. While that historic space journey was nearing its completion, here on God’s good earth in the city of Baku in Azerbaijan, an 18-year-old chess prodigy from Tamil Nadu, Grandmaster Rameshbabu Praggnanandha, now fashionably Pragg, was creating his own history by pushing Norwegian chess maestro Magnus Carlsen to the limit for the FIDE world title. From India’s point of view, a fairy-tale script would have visualised Chandrayaan-3 make a smooth landing on the moon’s surface, and barely 24 hours later, the young teenager from Chennai checkmating the wizard from Norway. While it did not go exactly according to script, it came agonisingly close to doing so, and India’s cup of joy truly runneth over. Chandrayaan-3 and Vikram Lander had India and the world agog with a perfect touchdown for the first time ever by any nation on the south pole, while the precocious teenager Pragg lost to a more experienced opponent by the skin of his teeth. India celebrated both these events as seminal landmarks. And rightly so.

The wonderful thing about the ISRO saga and the boy wonder’s brilliance was that both these milestones were blessedly free of any kind of political taint. However, our political earthlings can hardly be expected to let momentous happenings pass without diving, deep end first, into a messy, me-too maelstrom. The imbroglio started with the television coverage of the moon landing. As Chandrayaan-3 was nearing its appointed destination on the lunar surface, our idiot box screens were split into two. While one half stayed with the historic descent towards the moon, the other half unveiled our Prime Minister, taking time off from the BRICS summit in Johannesburg, eyes glued to the history-making satellite. Waving our national flag, the PM watched with swelling pride and perhaps a touch anxiously, that all would be well if it ends well. Well, it did, and the PM did what he does best. Took centre stage and spoke eloquently and at length, praised all concerned particularly the scientists at ISRO, and did not miss a trick to ensure his own Government’s inspiring, leadership role was not lost on the populace. Some may aver that the word Government is surplus to requirements, but I will let that pass.

With a plethora of state elections in the offing, culminating in the magnum opus General Elections in May 2024, the ruling party will doubtless take every opportunity to blow their own trumpet, fortissimo, to extract full mileage from any event that positively redounds towards favourable optics. That is only to be expected of any ruling party that has one eye firmly fixed on the forthcoming hustings.

That being said, the opposition parties were quick to denounce the PM’s television appearance at the crucial hour of the moon landing, as little more than a brazen publicity-seeking stunt. In the somewhat low-key (thankfully) verbal slugfest that followed, if slugfests can ever be low-key, the opposition bench took exception to the PM hogging all the limelight, after showering fulsome encomiums on ISRO, and not acknowledging the role played by past leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru in India’s march towards becoming a technological power, driven by science and technology. The nation’s ‘scientific temper’ owes much to the founding fathers of the nation since India’s independence, they cried in unison.

The usual cut, thrust and parry that we have been witness to on a number of occasions in the past, continued apace. The names of Nehru, Indira Gandhi, and Vajpayee were taken in vain by both sides of the political binary. May their departed souls not stir restlessly. The Prime Minister’s name was taken, as is the party apparatchik’s wont, at the drop of a hat to bolster his stature as a leader of unparalleled dynamism and integrity. What all that has to do with the moon landing is neither here nor there. In politics anything and everything goes, so long as we can fit in 22 talking heads at the same time on our news channels, along with a hyper-ventilating anchor frothing at the mouth.

The opposition worthies, just by virtue of being in the minority, find themselves stranded to defend the vigorous onslaught of the treasury bench wallahs. They have no option but to sing hosannas to ISRO, as that august and noble body is beyond the pale of humdrum politics, and the ruling party will always be controlling the narrative just by being there. Bengal Chief Minister, Mamata Banerjee even comically referred to Bollywood actor-director Rakesh Roshan in recalling India’s past space heroes, when she meant to say Rakesh Sharma. If the BJP are all over the place like a rash, the Congress counters by putting out full page adverts showcasing Nehru, Sarabhai and, incongruously, the local Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister of Karnataka, and the stellar role played by all of them leading up to the success of Chandrayaan-3, not to mention INDIA without the intervening full stops, but subliminally flagging the opposition alliance. I am speaking only of the Bangalore papers here, where ISRO’s HQ is based. Obviously, no mention of the honourable PM can be expected in what is clearly a Congress party political campaign. 

Not to be outdone (when is he ever?), the PM landed in Bangalore at the crack of dawn on Saturday week, feted the entire ISRO team and was in turn fulsomely feted.  Sensitive to every nuance, the PM had special words for the women at ISRO (Naari Shakti), and their stellar contributions to the success of the project. Never one to miss a trick, a natural born brand guru, the PM anointed the precise points on the moon where Chandrayaan-2 nearly landed and Chandrayaan-3 successfully touched down as – Tiranga and Shiv Shakti respectively. What is more, Chandrayaan-3’s date of landing on the moon, August 23, 2023, will now be celebrated as National Space Day. That is a full plate to savour and the opposition has already started aiming its barbs.

Lest we forget, on November 14, 2008, Chandrayaan-1’s lunar probe had ‘impacted’ at a point near the south pole, whatever that means. The impact point was named Jawahar Point. November 14 also happens to be India’s first PM Jawaharlal Nehru’s birthday. That should set the cat among the pigeons.

On the flip side, a proposed road show in Bangalore was cancelled at the last minute. An eminently wise decision. It would have been too much of a good thing and would have undoubtedly added more fuel to the simmering flame. However, we can expect to hear more on this subject. A bit of argy-bargy surrounding the issue of why Karnataka’s CM and Dy. CM were not on hand to receive the PM at Bangalore and attend the ISRO function, was doused by the PM himself who had requested them and the Governor not to inconvenience themselves at the crack of dawn to pay their obsequies. And did the CM hurriedly visit ISRO earlier to rub some of the sheen off the PM’s visit? Dear, oh dear! Will the carping never end?

A totally needless distraction was the BBC’s not-so-veiled criticism, four years ago, of India’s 2019 Chandrayaan-2 venture, which was raked up and our media went into overdrive. The BBC was rightly chastised for clinging on to a colonial mindset, stereotyping India as it was several decades ago, struggling to feed its starving millions, yet splurging money on space missions it could ill afford. Unless I am missing something, I was unable to understand why the BBC’s 4-year-old broadcast was resurrected now, adding greatly to the noise levels and detracting from our hour of glory. Ironically, I do not recall the subject being discussed when it was first aired. To the best of my knowledge, the Chandrayaan-3 triumph was lauded by most western nations and media, though a tad guardedly.

One thing is clear. The political by-play from the sidelines has been confined to the Chandrayaan-3 mission. We must thank heaven that Pragg’s dazzling moves over 64 squares in Azerbaijan have not attracted any political one-upmanship thus far. Let us hope it stays that way. The PM was one among many dignitaries from across various walks of life who extended his good wishes to the young man from Madras. Doubtless his home state, Tamil Nadu, will shower him with riches and encomiums beyond the dreams of avarice. Here’s wishing that he is not distracted by all the hoopla that will surround him. He looks a well-grounded youngster imbued with solid, middle-class family values. Coincidentally, those values are almost a mirror image of the personality profile of the entire ISRO personnel. That said, it will not be long before Pragg is seen on our small screens endorsing any number of brands. You will get very long odds from a bookmaker if you bet against that prediction.

 It is significant that having landed safely on the moon, Chandrayaan-3 mission’s Rover Pragyan rolled down from the lander Vikram to commence its various scientific investigations. A mechanical Prag, scientifically and technologically driven, is surveying the lunar surface with the proverbial fine toothcomb; here on earth a human Pragg, strategically and mathematically hardwired, is forever scouring 64 squares on a chess board, inspired by tales from the Mahabharat and the Chaturanga, an early version of chess which also served as a brainstorming exercise for ancient war games.

If only our politicians don’t ruin it all.